Logarithms, Explained!
Steve Kelly tells you all about logarithms. Don’t fear the strange keys on your calculator! Instead, learn how simple they really are.
Not to mention how logarithms can tell you why your eyes turn red after opening them underwater at the pool.
(by TEDEducation)
Bad Bad Batz
Look, my last name is Batz, OK? OK.
Posts tagged science
Woah. SMBC comic on parasitic host manipulation, likely inspired by Toxoplasma gondii:
Infection with T. gondii has been shown to alter the behavior of mice and rats in ways thought to increase the rodents’ chances of being predated upon by cats. Infected rodents show a reduction in their innate aversion to cat odors; while uninfected mice and rats will generally avoid areas marked with cat urine or with cat body odor, this avoidance is reduced or eliminated in infected animals. Moreover, there is some evidence to suggest that this loss-of-aversion may be specific to feline odors: when given a choice between two predator odors (cat or mink), infected rodents show a significantly stronger preference to cat odors than do uninfected controls.
I have a feeling this comic might show up in one of my talks someday…
A 250-times magnified view of Aspergillus sp., a common mold.
Image by Dr. Juan Alberto Morales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma.
(via misantropo)
Genetics of the Beautiful “Glass Gem” Corn
Corn gone viral? You’re looking at an ear of a corn variety called “Glass Gem”, grown by Greg Schoen of Seeds Trust. This is real corn! How does it grow this way?
First you have to understand a few things about corn. Each corn kernel is actually a sort of unique plant. A corn plant’s…
Woah.
❖ Fritz Haber
In the most recent episode of Radiolab, The Bad Show, they spent a bit of time talking about Fritz Haber, and it was fascinating. Haber won the Nobel Prize in 1918 for his work, but is infamous for some other reasons. In short:
- In 1909, Haber developed, along with Carl Bosch, the “Haber Process” of creating ammonia from hydrogen and atmospheric nitrogen, the basis for nitrogen-based fertilizers that are responsible for sustaining about a third of the world’s population today. Rather: “Without it, the Earth wouldn’t be able to support its current population.”
- During World War I, Haber was a leading proponent and developer of poison gas warfare and led “gas troops” to deploy them. During the Second Battle of Ypres in April 1915, he personally oversaw the first ever deadly gas attack in military history, releasing over 150 tons of chlorine gas (his own creation) on Allied troops, wounding or killing “between 5,000 and 15,000 people.”
- Following his successes with poison gas at Ypres, Haber threw a party, but his wife, also a prominent chemist, was so horrified by his involvement and subsequent boasting that she killed herself with a bullet to the chest.
- Haber was seemingly unaffected by his wife’s suicide, as he returned to the front lines as scheduled later the same day as her death, leaving his young son to mourn alone.
- Following the War, Haber returned to his post directing the Institute for Physical and Electrochemistry at Berlin-Dahlem, where he stayed until 1933. He resigned in protest under Hitler when laws were passed that would have had Haber, a Jew himself, fire all Jewish researchers and employees under him.
- While directing the Institute in the 1920s, he oversaw the development of Zyklon A, a cyanide-based pesticide with a strong warning odor, and Zyklon B, a similar pesticide without the odor. Zyklon B was fairly widely used as a sanitizing agent by Germany, and even by the U.S., but is infamous for its use in Nazi extermination camps. It is possible that Haber’s own family were killed in gas chambers with Zyklon B.
- As a bit of a coda, in 2002, the Pew Oceans Commission found nitrogen fertilizer from farm runoff to be the largest source of pollution in the oceans.
The show was about good and evil, but my main take-away is that the story perfectly illustrates the role and power of science. Science can be used to make the world better, or worse, and sometimes scientists are more intent on the methods than the meaning.
Moreover, it makes me thankful to be an ordinary non-genius doing semi-purposeful work with a fairly clear and limited objective, rather than a super-genius intent on creating the knowledge to both save and destroy humanity. To each his own, I guess.
‘The impact of science on society’ by Bertrand Russell, p.89.
One of my heroes.
An actual piece of actual legislation written by an actual Oklahoma state senator, who was later quoted as saying, “I don’t know if it is happening in Oklahoma, it may be, it may not be. What I am saying is that if it does happen then we are not going to allow it to manufacture here.”
Why? Because some anti-choice dumbasses are whipped into a tizzy because Pepsi had the gall to contract with a company that has developed a sort of automated taste tester that uses stem cells from a line originally derived from a human embryo in the Netherlands in the 1970s.
Yes, those 1970s. I mean, really now.
John Iaonnidis: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (PLoS Medicine)
This 2005 essay has been in my “must read” stack for a while. Tells you something about the size of that stack, or about my attention span, or something:
Abstract: There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. In this essay, I discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research.
While you’re at it, Instapaper the shit out of this excellent profile of Iaonnidis.
via bookofjoe
This is exactly how they taught us in school, but with Winnie the Pooh as Amperage, Kareem Abdul-Jabbar as Game of Death’s Hakim as Voltage, and Dino Bravo as Resistance.
This is a cool interactive tool for “visualizing information flow in science,” based upon scientific journal eigenfactor rankings. It’s limited to only the most influential journals, but you can explore citation linkages between journals in a number of ways, and see how journal influence changes over time. The interface doesn’t provide a simple way of finding a specific journal, and a few of my favorites aren’t represented at all, but it’s still pretty fun to poke around.
[via]
My project is a set of DNA molecule plush dolls that magnetically-interact where they naturally hydrogen bond!
So cool.
